War of the Words: A Pragmatic Study of the Characters' Confronted Discourse in Pirandello's "WAR"

Main Article Content

Amin Ghailan

Abstract

The novelty of this research is that it links pragmatic markers with the study of discourse, with specific attention on the characters' roles and speech in showing discourse strategies. So, the research paper tackles pragmatic markers, quotation markers, question markers, general extenders, and evidential markers in the characters' discourse in Pirandello's text.                                 


    The objective of this paper is to show how the study of pragmatic markers can be of great importance for showing discourse practices. The analysis will also demonstrate the benefits of the amalgamation of pragmatic markers and discourse analysis research. This short story should be seen as a text focusing on political discourse. Such a text is told by politically powerless actors.                                                                                                                        


    There is also a discussion of such pragmatic markers and how they contribute to the characteristics of the discourse of characters in the story. The study of pragmatic markers should be associated with the manipulative manifestations in a discourse. One of the important findings of this study is that any single pragmatic marker may have some important manipulative functions. The present study builds on the findings arrived at in the analysis of Pirandello's story, according to the pragmatic functional spectrum. It considers the findings from the perspective of influential pragmatic intent

Article Details

Section

Articals

How to Cite

War of the Words: A Pragmatic Study of the Characters’ Confronted Discourse in Pirandello’s "WAR". (2021). Journal of Misan Researches, 17(34), 389-428. https://jmr.uomisan.edu.iq/index.php/jmr/article/view/80

References

Aijmer, K.(1997). " I think- An English Modal Particle". In Swan, T. and Westvik, O.

J.(eds.). Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative

Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp.1-47.

Allot, N. (2010). Key Terms in Pragmatics. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Athanasiadou, A. (1990)." The Discourse Function of Questions"(revised edition). Journal of Applied Linguistics.Vol.9, pp.15-21. Greece:Halkidiki.

Baker, P. and Ellege, S. (2011). Key Terms in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Billig, M. (2008). " The Language of Critical Discourse Analysis: The Case of

Nominalization". Discourse and Society.19(6). pp.783-800.

Blakemore, D. and Gallai, F. (2014)." Discourse Markers in Free Indirect Style and

Interpreting". Journal of Pragmatics.60. pp.106-120.

Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Burr, V. (1995). An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.

Curtis, N. (2006). War and Social Theory World, Value and Identity. London:

Palgrave Macmillan. Available at:

interdisciplinary.net/ptb/www/www4/Boll%20paper.pdf

Fetzer, A.(2000). " Contextualization Cues: More-and Less-Fuzzy Hedges, Discourse

Markers and Interpersonal Markers. Discourse Particles, Modal and Focal

Particles and all that Stuff". An International Conference on Particles.

Linguistic Society of Belgium: Brussels.

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.

Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G. and Trew, T.(1979). Language and Social Control.

Routledge: London.

Fraser, B.(1996)." Pragmatic Markers". Pragmatics. Vol.6(2).pp.167-190.

Furko, P.(2017). "Manipulative Uses of Pragmatic Markers in Political Discourse".

Journal of Palgrave Communication. Vol.3,17045. Available at:

http://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.54

Hinds, J.(1990). "Inductive, Deductive, Quasi-Inductive: Expository Writing in

Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and Thai". In U. Connor and A. M. Jones(eds.),

Coherence in Writing Research and Pedagogical Perspectives. pp.89-109.

Alexandria VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.

Hooti, N.(2012). "The Suppressed and Overlooked Sobs of the War under the Shame

Shield of Honor, Heroism and Patriotism". Journal of Basic and Applied

Scientific Research. Vol.2,N.4. pp(1308-4311).

Hooti, N. and Mahmoudi, Y.(2013). "Identity Discordianism under the Trepidation

and Duplicity of Human Essence: A Trenchant Investigation on Luigi

Pirandello's War". Journal of Theory and Practice in Language Studies.Vol.3,

No.7, pp.1209-1213.

Ifantidou, E.(2001). Evidentials and Relevance. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.

Lauerbach, G.(2006)." Discourse Representation in Political Interviews: The

Construction of Identifiers and Relations through Voicing and Ventriloquizing".

Journal of Pragmatics.Vol.38(2).pp.196-215.

Maynard, S. (2017). "Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics". In The Handbook of

Japanese Linguistics. Natsuko Tsujimura(ed.). pp.(425-443). Available at:

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405166225.ch15

Norrby, C. and Winter, J.(2002). "Affiliation in Adolescents' Use of Discourse

Extenders". Proceedings of the 2001Conference of the Australian Linguistic

Society. Available at:

http://www.als.asn.au/proceedings/als2001/winter_norrby.pdf

Nuckolls, J.(1993). " The Semantics of Certainty in Quechua and its Implications for

a Cultural Epistemology". Language in Society. Vol.22(2).pp.235-255.

Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology. Beyond

Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.

Sandova, J.(2010). Speaker's Involvement in Political Interviews. M.A. thesis,

Masarykova University: Brno.

Schegloff, E.(1968). Sequencing in Conversational Openings. American

Anthropologist. 70, 1075-95.

Simon- Vandenbergen, A., White, P. and Aijmer, K.(2007). " Presupposition and

'Taking- for- Granted' in Mass Communicated Political Argument: An Illustration

from British, Flemish and Swedish Political Colloquy". In Fetzer, A. and

Lauterbach, G.(eds.).Political Discourse in the Media. John Benjamins:

Amsterdam.pp31-75.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural

Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

van Dijk, T.A.(1993). "Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis". Discourse and

Society. 4(2). pp.249-283.

van Leeuwen, T.(1996). " The Representation of Social Actors". in Caldas-Coulthard

CR and Coulthard M (eds.). Texts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse

Analysis. Routledge: London, pp.32-69.

Wilson, J.(2001). "Political Discourse". In Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton,

H.E.(eds.).The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Blackwell: Malden, MA,

pp.398-414.

Wodak, R.(1989). Language, Power, and Ideology. John Benjamins: Amsterdam,

The Netherlands/ Philadelphia, PA.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.